The story is told that when American planners were upbraided about unintended consequences in arming jihadi fighters in Afghanistan in the 1980s, the Americans answered that the strategy worked as it was supposed to – "it hurt and bled the Soviet Union. Period." This is a supremely cynical form of revisionism allowing one to ignore all sort of inconvenient forms of blowback.
This old story came to mind when listening to Western defenders of Erdogan's Turkey, particularly in its recent actions in the Caucasus where it is aiding and abetting a war killing Armenian Christians. The argument goes something like this: "Turkey is opposed to Armenia, which is allied to Russia, Syria, and Iran. These are America's adversaries, so this action by Turkey helps American interests. Period."
While Turkey's encouragement and arming of Azerbaijan has led to the killing hundreds of Armenians and reclaimed some territory in the disputed (internationally recognized as part of Azerbaijan but heavily populated by ethnic Armenians) Nagorno-Karabakh region, it is not at all clear that Russia, Syria, and Iran have been so damaged by Turkey's latest round of aggressive power politics.
Turkish (and Israeli) drones have blown up a lot of Armenian armor provided by Russia, but we have been seeing advanced technology blowing up Russian-supplied tanks and artillery for decades now in the Middle East. What this bloody little war in a volatile corner of the world has done is dilute Armenian independence, making it more, rather than less, dependent on Russia. It has also weakened reformist Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan, who came to power in a 2018 "Velvet Revolution" against an entrenched pro-Russian elite. This is an outright gift for Russia, which wants to prevent Pashinyan's Armenia from leaning towards the West.[1] Even as Russian tanks explode, Moscow becomes the key player in the Southern Caucasus, the spoiler for both Armenia and Azerbaijan. This is clear even if the Russians may be publicly uncomfortable explaining the ambivalence of their relations with Turkey.[2]
Armenia is allied with Assad's Syria, but this is an alliance of two ramshackle powers of little strategic value to each other. And it is worth recalling that while Turkey takes actions that supposedly hurt pro-Assad Armenia, it has helped pro-Assad Venezuela in much more lucrative ways. Turkey's imports of Venezuelan gold – which comes from a conflict zone rife with human rights abuse and Colombian cartels[3] – rose from zero to almost a billion in 2018, with the concern that Turkey was the key middleman in helping this triangular traffic with Iran.[4]
Venezuelan Minister and narcotics kingpin Tareck El Aissami visiting Turkey in 2019 (Source: Lapatilla.com, January 17, 2019)
Latin American media in 2019 showed the smiling Venezuelan Minister of Industries and National Production Tareck El Aissami, scion of a well-known Libano-Venezuelan Baathist family, visiting a Turkish gold-smelting plant as part of Turkish-Venezuelan cooperation. The notorious El Aissami is well known for his close ties to Hizbullah and the Assad regime, as well as for accusations against him concerning corruption, money laundering, and drug-trafficking.[5]
Turkey's Caucasus intervention has actually helped Russia's interests, and whatever damage it has inflicted on an ally of the Syrian regime seems to be more than outweighed by the help it has given to another ally of the Syrian regime in the Western hemisphere. And as far as U.S. foreign policy is concerned, Venezuela is a much higher priority than Assad-Armenia relations.
But is it with Iran that Turkey's Armenian adventure has played its most "positive" role? The idea here is that Turkey's intervention on behalf of Azerbaijan has stoked irredentist pan-Turkic aspirations among Iran's restive Azeri minority. Let's give Turkey full marks for bringing this about, even though internal ethnic tensions, including among the Azeris who make up 16% of Iran's population, are nothing new within the borders of the Iranian regime.[6] The tangible result of this unrest seems to have been to shift Iran's position – at least publicly –closer to Azerbaijan and away from Armenia.[7]
The upshot of all of this turmoil seems clear. The losers, so far, are Armenia and the Nagorno-Karabakh Armenians. Turkey and Azerbaijan, and I would add Russia, are all beneficiaries. Assad's broken Syria is inconsequential to the discussion and Iran, at worst, has been forced by internal security concerns from leaning too openly towards Armenia to appearing to lean more towards Azerbaijan. That's about it.
In the meantime, Turkey has threatened war against NATO member Greece and EU member Cyprus, just recently activated Russian S-400 air defense in open defiance of U.S. wishes,[8] become the regional hub of anti-U.S. and antisemitic Islamist propaganda aimed at the Arab world,[9] aided sanctions-busting smuggling schemes for the benefit of both Venezuela and Iran, and displaced Christian and other religious minorities in Syria and Iraq – an issue about which many may not care but which is an announced priority of the Trump administration).[10]
Turkey's use of thousands of Syrian Islamist mercenaries in Libya and Azerbaijan as a mercenary army is another tactic which may have unforeseen consequences.[11] And the possible consequences of Erdogan's repeated threats to send millions of migrants into Europe seem equally murky, but in no way can be seen as being in the interests of the U.S. The Erdogan regime thinks it is being very clever, playing one power against another for its own benefit. But the overall result seems to be constant chaos and turmoil which an already burdened West is forced to manage and try to contain.
Even if there was some benefit to the U.S. from Turkish aggression in the Caucasus – and such a benefit seems to be tiny if not invisible – it would seem that this long and growing list of Turkey's regional actions hostile to the U.S. far outweighs any possible benefit from its latest misadventure.
*Alberto M. Fernandez is Vice President of MEMRI.
[1] MEMRI Special Dispatch No. 8947, Russian Commentator Akopov: The Alarmists Are Wrong, Russia's Position In Transcaucasia Is Impregnable, Turkey Can Become A Player There Only With Russia's Assent, October 7, 2020.
[2] MEMRI Special Dispatch No. 8972, Questioned By Skeptical Interviewers, Russian FM Lavrov Struggles To Defend Russia's Current Policy Towards Turkey,
October 16, 2020.
[3] Cambio16.com/arco-minero-del-orinoco-mineria-ilegal-en-venezuela, June 26, 2020.
[4] Bbc.com/news/world-europe-47092784, February 2, 2019.
[5] Lapatilla.com/2019/01/17/tareck-el-aissami-visita-refinadora-de-oro-en-turquia, January 17, 2019.
[6] Washingtoninstitute.org/policy-analysis/view/iranian-azeris-a-giant-minority, June 6, 2006.
[7] Middleeasteye.net/news/azerbaijan-armenia-iran-conflict-pan-turkism-azeris, October 13, 2020.
[8] Defensenews.com/training-sim/2020/10/16/turkey-reportedly-test-fires-s-400-air-defense-system, October 17, 2020.
[9] MEMRI Daily Brief No. 222, The Arabic Propaganda War From Istanbul, July 17, 2020.
[10] Osvnews.com/2019/10/10/turkeys-invasion-of-syria-strikes-a-blow-against-christians, October 10, 2019.
[11] Nybooks.com/daily/2020/10/16/the-syrian-mercenaries-fighting-foreign-wars-for-russia-and-turkey, October 16, 2020.