It has recently been reported that U.S. President Donald Trump plans to slap oil sanctions on Iran beginning in November of this year. To this end, on June 30, 2018 he asked Saudi King Salman Bin 'Abd Al-'Aziz to increase his country's oil production so as to prevent any shortage of oil when the sanctions on Iran come into effect. This led Iranian officials, chief of them Iranian President Hassan Rouhani, to threaten that, if Iran is prevented from exporting oil, other countries in the region will not be able to continue exporting their own oil.
Against this backdrop, Senior Saudi journalist 'Abd Al-Rahman Al-Rashed, who is a former editor of the Saudi London-based daily Al-Sharq Al-Awsat and former director of the Al-Arabiya website, pointed out that most of the wars in the Middle East are over oil, and argued that, regardless of Iran's threats, oil sanctions are indeed the most effective weapon to use against the Iranian regime. The recent U.S. sanctions and measures against Iran, he wrote, have already caused a decline in its oil production capacity, which contributed to the collapse of its currency that sparked widespread protests across the country in June. Therefore, he concluded, if Saudi Arabia cooperates with the U.S. in pressuring Iran on the oil front, this may bring the Iranian regime to a point where it can no longer maintain its policy of military intervention in other countries. At that point this regime will either be forced to change its policies and comply with the West's demands, or else collapse.
It should be noted that, in a 2012 article, Al-Rashed expressed support for the oil embargo that had been imposed on Iran at the time (See MEMRI Special Dispatch No. 4830, Al-Arabiya TV Director-General: Saudi Arabia Has Beaten Iran In The First Round Of Oil War, July 12, 2012).
The following is his article, as it was published on the Al-Arabiya English website.[1]
'Abd Al-Rahman Al-Rashed (image: english.alarabiya.net)
"We can attribute most of the region’s wars to the conflict over oil, whether directly or indirectly. Today, we are in the midst of a huge regional oil war. Iran wants to use oil against the West and Iran’s rivals want to use oil to suffocate it. Iranian Vice President Eshaq Jahangiri threatened Saudi Arabia and the Gulf countries, albeit without naming them, and said: 'Anyone trying to take away Iran’s oil market (share) would be committing great treachery against Iran and will one day pay for it.' Jahangiri’s statement came after the phone call between the Saudi king and the US president and in which they agreed on supporting oil stability."
"President Donald Trump said Saudi Arabia will support the stability of the oil market and raise output by 2 million barrels if needed. Despite that, the decline of oil prices is the least of the Iranian regime’s worries, especially that its oil production capacity decreased as a result of the Trump administration’s quick strikes, such as preventing American oil companies and other companies from engaging in activities pertaining to exploration, production, shipping and insurance.
"Pressure on Tehran increased following the foreign tours of the US Secretary of State and the retreat of major markets, like India, from buying Iranian oil. The Iranian rial hit an all-time low ever since Trump’s economic war on Tehran. As a result, protests erupted again across Iranian cities as in the past three days there have been protests in Tehran over the deteriorating economic situation.
"The rapid economic sanctions are very effective and they are certainly better than military confrontation which may erupt as a result of the Iranian regime’s expansion and foreign wars. With the deterioration of the government’s sources of income, Iran has actually begun to decline and this will mostly end with its collapse unless the government has the supreme leader’s approval to make great concessions. This is unlikely in the current phase and until the end of this year."
"The Iranian VP’s threats are directed at Saudi Arabia because the latter ruined its capability to resist the boycott, while meeting the needs of Iran’s customer markets, like India. By increasing production, Iran will also fail in playing its only card with Washington, which is that the lack of supply could have forced the Trump administration to back down on boycotting Iran on the oil front.
"Iran can sell its oil but in small amounts and for cheap prices, and it will immediately lose its main revenues which it uses to pay for the war in Syria and Yemen and of course in Lebanon. It is unlikely that it will stop paying the wages of its employees and fund subsidies of the citizens’ essential products as this will expedite the end of the regime, which has been sitting on hot tin for almost a year and a half now.
"The oil game is important in the American-Gulf-Iranian war. Perhaps it’s the strongest weapon in the strategy to pressure Iran to back down and accept the US’s 12 conditions or it may later lead to the collapse of the regime. Let’s not forget that it’s through oil that Ayatollah Khomeini reached power when the movement that opposed the Shah succeeded in halting refineries’ work and stopping oil exports, and the Shah’s exit became a domestic and foreign demand."
[1] English.alarabiya.net, July 3, 2018. The article also appeared in Arabic, on the same date, in the London-based daily Al-Sharq Al-Awsat.
