Russian President Putin: 'As For The United States Saying They Have No "Red Lines" With Russia, They Should Realize That Russia Will Have No "Red Lines" With Them Either'; 'We Are Certainly Ready' For Nuclear War – The Troops 'Are Constantly On Alert'

On March 13, 2024, Russian President Vladimir Putin gave a lengthy interview to leading Russian TV presenter Dmitry Kiselev. In the interview, Putin discussed economic and domestic political issues in depth. He also focused on West-Russia relations in relation to the war in Ukraine.

Concerning the ongoing war in Ukraine, Putin said: "Are we ready to negotiate? We sure are. But we are definitely not ready for talks that are based on some kind of 'wishful thinking' which comes after the use of psychotropic drugs, but we are ready for talks based on the realities that have developed, as they say in such cases, on the ground."

The Russian president also added: "The United States announced that they are not going to send troops. We know what American troops in the Russian territory are. These are invaders... I do not think that it is getting closer to a head-on collision. But we are ready for it."

Discussing the possibility of a nuclear war, Putin stressed: "From a military-technical point of view, we are certainly ready. They [the troops] are constantly on alert. This is the first thing. Secondly. Our nuclear triad is more advanced than any other one, and this is also a universally recognized fact. We and the Americans are the only ones who have such a triad, actually... this does not mean that they are ready to wage this nuclear war tomorrow. If they want to, what is there to do? We are ready." He then underlined: "We are ready to use weapons, including the ones you have just mentioned [i.e. nuclear ones], when it is about the existence of the Russian state, about harming our sovereignty and independence. We have everything spelled out in our Strategy. We have not changed it."

(Source: Kremlin.ru)

Following are excerpts of Putin's interview with Dmitry Kiselev:[1]

Putin: "We Need To Increase Our Weapons In Terms Of Its Number And Power"

Dmitry Kiselev: "Historically, it is quite clear that Nazi regimes do not dissolve themselves but disappear as a result of military defeat. This was the case in Germany, in Italy, and in Japan. The same will obviously be happening with the Bandera Nazi regime. We are now advancing all along the front line, judging by reports from both the Defense Ministry and our war correspondents.

"Did we finally manage to find a strategy when our casualties are reduced on the offensive compared to the defense? This is a rather unconventional task to accomplish in the art of war, but it always holds back the offensive. It is prudence, and it's absolutely reasonable with respect to our heroic warriors. Yet it raises a question: how we can advance with minimal losses?"

Vladimir Putin: "The question is clear and fair. The answer is also quite simple: we need to increase our weapons in terms of its number and power, while also improving the effectiveness of the forces and means used. This includes both tactical and army air force, as well as strategic aviation. By this I mean, of course, within those aspects that are acceptable for armed conflicts of this kind. Here, I refer to ground weapons, including high-precision ones, also artillery and armored vehicles. It is no exaggeration to say that we are developing by leaps and bounds."

Dmitry Kiselev: "In this direction?"

Vladimir Putin: "Yes, this is exactly what's happening today. And this is the answer to your question: the more weapons we have and the more powerful they are, the fewer casualties we suffer."

Dmitry Kiselev: "And yet one raises a question. What price are we ready to pay for this – perhaps 'project' is not the proper word – challenge we have been historically forced to face?"

Vladimir Putin: "Look, every human life is priceless, every single one. The loss of a loved one to a family, to any family, is a tremendous grief.

"But what is the key point here? The point is to make clear what we are doing. And what are we doing? We met today and, as you have noticed, one of the participants in the conversation said: we were surprised to find out that there are Russians there just like us. So, we came to the rescue of these people. Basically, this is the answer to your question.

"If we leave these people today, tomorrow our losses may increase many times over. Our children will have no future, because we will feel insecure, we will be a third- or fourth-class country. No one will factor us in if we cannot defend ourselves, so the consequences could be catastrophic for the Russian statehood. That is the answer."

Putin: "For Us To Hold Negotiations Now Just Because They Are Running Out Of Ammunition Would Be Ridiculous"

Dmitry Kiselev: "While the Americans seem to be talking about negotiations and strategic stability, they declare the need to inflict a strategic defeat on Russia. Our position is as follows, 'We are open to negotiations, but the time for goodwill gestures has passed, it's over.' Does it mean that there will be no negotiations?"

Vladimir Putin: "We have never refused to negotiate."

Dmitry Kiselev: "But is there a compromise without goodwill gestures? How can it be achieved then?"

Vladimir Putin: "Let me try to explain that. I have already said this many times, but if it needs to be repeated, I will. When we were holding talks in Istanbul, Türkiye, with the negotiators from the other side, we ended up having a thick folio, a document, which was actually a draft treaty. We have an excerpt from that treaty in the Presidential Executive Office; it was initialed by the head of the negotiating group on the Ukrainian side, Mr. Arakhamia. You can see his signature on it. But then, as you already know, Mr. Arakhamia himself publicly told the world – it was also at a meeting with journalists, I believe, even with foreign ones – that former Prime Minister of Great Britain Mr. Johnson arrived and convinced them not to sign the treaty and, therefore, not to implement it. And so they started to bring up the topic you have just mentioned – we need to defeat Russia on the battlefield.

"Are we ready to negotiate? We sure are. But we are definitely not ready for talks that are based on some kind of 'wishful thinking' which comes after the use of psychotropic drugs, but we are ready for talks based on the realities that have developed, as they say in such cases, on the ground. This is the first thing.

"Secondly, we have already been promised a lot of things many times before. We were promised that NATO would not expand to the East, but then we saw NATO at our borders. We were promised, without delving into history, that the internal conflict in Ukraine would be resolved by peaceful, political means. As we remember, three foreign ministers from Poland, Germany and France came to Kiev and promised that they would be guarantors of these agreements. One day later, the coup d'état took place. We were promised that the Minsk agreements would be honored, and then they publicly announced that they never intended to fulfil their promises, instead they only took a pause to arm the Bandera regime in Ukraine. We were promised a lot of things, so that is why promises alone are not enough.

"For us to hold negotiations now just because they are running out of ammunition would be ridiculous. Nevertheless, we are open to a serious discussion, and we are eager to resolve all conflicts, especially this one, by peaceful means. However, we must be sure that this is not just another pause that the enemy wants to use for rearmament, but rather a serious conversation with security guarantees for the Russian Federation.

"We know various options that are being discussed, we know the 'lures' they are going to show us in order to convince us that the time has come. Once again, we want to resolve all disputes and this particular dispute, this particular conflict, by peaceful means. And we are ready for that, we want that. But this should be a serious negotiation with provision of security for the opposing side, and in this case we are primarily interested in the security of the Russian Federation. That is what we will proceed from."

Putin: "I Don't Trust Anyone"

Dmitry Kiselev: "Mr. President, I am afraid we appear too generous, don't we? Wouldn't it be the case that we conclude another agreement with them and they will cheat us once again? And we will console ourselves with the thought that we did it all honestly and it was they who cheated. Are we doomed to always end up with egg on our face?

"Back in the 1990s, the United States coined themselves medals for the victory in the Cold War, and the decades since that time have been the decades of great lies. How can we ever hope that they finally conclude an honest treaty with us and comply with it and give us guarantees? I do not know how we are to handle them. Do you really believe this is at all possible?"

Vladimir Putin: "I hate saying this, but I don't trust anyone."

Dmitry Kiselev: "Well."

Vladimir Putin: "But we need guarantees. These guarantees have to be put down on paper, and they should suit us and they should make us trust them. That is what I mean.

"It would probably be premature to publicly say that it could be possible. But we certainly will not buy any empty promises."

Dmitry Kiselev: "I am afraid your words might be cited and interpreted broadly. When you say that you don't trust anyone, do you mean that you trust nobody at all or do you refer to the Western partners in this particular case?"

Vladimir Putin: "I prefer to rely on the facts rather than be guided by wishful thinking and assurances that everybody can be trusted. You see, the responsibility for the consequences of any decision of this magnitude is immense. For this reason we will do nothing that would prejudice the interests of our country."

Putin: "Even If Foreign Countries Are To Send Their Troops Officially, It Will Not Change The Situation On The Ground"

Dmitry Kiselev: "Mr. President, what happened to Emmanuel Macron? Has he gone nuts? He is going to send French troops against our army. He looks like a fighting Gallic rooster and has scared all Europeans. How should one take it?"

Vladimir Putin: "In fact, the Western countries' military personnel have been present in Ukraine for a long time. They had been there before the coup d'état, and after the coup their number has grown several times. Today they are involved both directly as military advisers and as foreign mercenaries, and they suffer casualties. Yet I am certain that even if foreign countries are to send their troops officially, it will not change the situation on the ground – and this is the most important thing because arms supplies change nothing.

"Second, it can lead to serious geopolitical consequences. If, say, Polish troops enter Ukrainian territory, allegedly for the protection of, say, the border between Belarus and Ukraine, or some other parts, to release Ukrainian troops and enable them to fight along the contact line, I think, Polish troops will stay there. That is what I believe. It is their heart's desire to get back the lands they have historically regarded as theirs, the lands that 'Father of the Peoples' Joseph Stalin took from them and gave to Ukraine. They certainly want to have these lands back. So, if Polish troops enter Ukraine, they will hardly ever leave it.

"In such a case, this example might be followed by other countries that lost parts of their territories after the Second World War. I think that Ukraine would face geopolitical consequences – at least as regards preserving its current statehood – in their full and unappealing magnitude."

Putin: "We Have Never Thrust Our Way To Africa, Neither Have We Squeezed France Out Of There"

Dmitry Kiselev: "Going back to Mr. Macron, could he be revenging himself on Russia for having taken him down a peg or two in Africa instead of playing nice and obedient? He did not expect Russia to be so active, did he?

Vladimir Putin: "Yes, I believe that might be a matter of some hard feelings, but when we maintained direct contacts with him we used to discuss this topic rather openly.

"We have never thrust our way to Africa, neither have we squeezed France out of there. The problem has a different source. There is a well-known Wagner group, which initially pursued a number of economic projects in Syria and subsequently spread its activities to some other countries in Africa. It has enjoyed the support of the Ministry of Defense, but only because it is a Russian group, no more. We have not squeezed anybody out of Africa. Rather, the leaders of some African countries had dealings with some Russian economic players and wanted to work with them, rather than with the French ones, in some areas. This was not our, but our African friends' initiative.

"So it is not clear, what we are to blame for in this connection, if an independent state wants to develop its ties with partners from other countries, including from Russia, wants to build its relations with Russia. We have not touched these former French colonists in those African countries. Without a touch of irony, many countries, for which France historically was a mother country, are very reluctant to deal with it. It is none of our fault. It might be more convenient to France to pin the blame on somebody else than to acknowledge its own faults. The French President's sharp and emotional reaction might be explained, among other things, by the developments in some African states.

"However, I know that there are other African countries, those that have no objections against French presence and say that they are happy and ready to work with the French. Yet some countries are not. It is not our doing. We are not brainwashing anybody and not inciting any anti-French sentiments there.

"We set ourselves no such tasks. To be frank, Russia has no state or national goals to pursue there. We merely maintain friendly ties. If they prefer to build their relations with Russia, they are most welcome, we reciprocate such steps. There is nothing to be offended with."

Putin: "German Opposition Is Behaving Even More Aggressively"

Dmitry Kiselev: "But now they are saying in France that there are no longer any 'red lines' left with regard to Russia, nothing is impossible and everything is possible. In general, they want to talk to us somehow on the basis of the balance of power. We hear a lot of things from France, from the West, and from Lithuania. In general, the chorus is not slender, but hostile.

"Maybe we, too, should go for unconventional solutions and at some point seek help from the two-million-strong North Korean army? For example, in exchange for our 'nuclear umbrella' over half of the Korean peninsula? Why not then?"

Vladimir Putin: "First of all, the Democratic People's Republic of Korea has its own 'nuclear umbrella.' They didn't ask us for anything. That's the first point.

"Second. In principle, based on what we see on the battlefield, we are coping with the tasks we set ourselves.

"As for the states saying that they have no 'red lines' with Russia, they should realize that Russia will have no 'red lines' with them either.

"As for small European states, first, we treat everyone with respect, no matter what. Second, when these small states call for toughening the policy towards Russia and taking some extreme measures, including, say, the deployment of troops and so on, they are still those states, and they understand this, which will not feel the consequences of their provocative statements. And those who may feel it, keep a low profile. And rightly so."

Dmitry Kiselev: "And all that German dancing with the Taurus missiles? Mr. Scholz says, 'we do not supply,' but there are forces that insist on sending the Taurus missiles to Ukraine, the British propose their initiative: let's do it via England, we are ready to send. The target is the Crimean Bridge, the German generals are already planning operations, as we have heard, not only targeting the Crimean Bridge, but also military bases, as they say, deep inside the Russian territory. Some are already saying these missiles could hit the Kremlin. Don't they go too far in their dreams?"

Vladimir Putin: "First, they are dreaming and cheering themselves up. Second, they are trying to intimidate us.

"As for Germany, there are constitutional problems there as well. They are right when they say that if the Taurus missiles hit that part of the Crimean Bridge, which is certainly, even according to their concepts, part of the Russian territory, this is a violation of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Germany.

"The fact is that German opposition is behaving even more aggressively. We will see what they will agree on. We are following this closely. British and American missiles are also used. But this does not change the situation on the battlefield. Yes, they're causing damage to us, of course, that's obvious. But, in essence, it does not affect the course of hostilities and the consequences that are inevitable for the other side.

"We are now hearing that in Germany – both your channels and foreign channels, German channels, show – how much they have, how much is in a bad state, how much requires improvement, modernization, and so on. Let them work. As you have rightly said, there are things they should think about. Those who are smarter think about it."

Putin: "We Had A Perfect Relationship With Finland... We Didn't Have Any Troops There, Now We Will – There Were No Weapon Systems, Now There Will Be"

Dmitry Kiselev: "And the new NATO members, Finland and Sweden, in general, what did they trade for what? Swedish Foreign Minister Tobias Billström suddenly told the Turks that Sweden was against NATO bases on the Swedish territory. Didn't they realize what they had joined? What happened to them?"

Vladimir Putin: "You have to ask them, I don't know. We had quite good relations, stable relations with those countries, and I think that they benefited more from the fact that they adhered to neutrality, because it gave certain advantages, at least as a negotiating platform to reduce tension in Europe.

"We had a perfect relationship with Finland, just perfect. We didn't have a single claim against each other, much less a territorial one, I am not talking about other areas. We didn't even have any troops there; we had removed everything from the Russian-Finnish border. Why did they do that? For purely political reasons, I think. I guess they really wanted to be a member of a Western club, under some kind of 'umbrella.' Why did they do that, I frankly don't understand. This is a totally senseless step in terms of safeguarding their own national interests. However, it's up to them to decide, and they made that decision.

"We didn't have any troops there, now we will. There were no weapon systems, now there will be. Why? We had very good economic relations. They used our market, we bought a lot from them. What's wrong with that? Now the situation will change. Many of their goods are not really needed in other markets, and they're missing out on our goods. I don't understand it."

Putin: "The United States Announced That They Are Not Going To Send Troops... I Do Not Think That It Is Getting Closer To A Head-On Collision – But We Are Ready For It"

Dmitry Kiselev: "Meanwhile, the United States finds itself amidst a fierce presidential race. And of course, they cannot do without you there. You are the invisible participant, because every Republican or Democratic candidate mentions you in their speech, giving reasons. It even seems that you never come off newspaper pages or TV news headlines and are always an argument in everyone's election campaign. You are even fueling the fire."

Vladimir Putin: "How is that?"

Dmitry Kiselev: "They say that we favor one candidate over others. If a foreign president says that one of the candidates in some other country is preferable, it is actually a textbook example of election-meddling. To which extent do you interfere in the American elections by claiming that we prefer to see Biden as president? And how true is that? What is that – some sort of trolling?"

Vladimir Putin: "Listen, first, I will tell you one thing that will prove that my preferences have not changed.

"Second. We do not interfere in any elections in any way, and I have said more than once that we will work with any leader trusted by the American people, the American voter.

"I find it curious that in his last year as president, Mr. Trump, current candidate for president, rebuked me for sympathizing with Mr. Biden. It was more than four years ago. This is what he told me during one of our conversations, excuse me for a direct quote: 'You want Sleepy Joe to win.'

"He told me that when he was still President. Later, to my surprise, he got persecuted for Russia allegedly having supported him as candidate. That's total rubbish.

"As for the current situation with the elections, it is getting increasingly uncivilized. I wouldn't want to comment on that at all.

"Besides, it is quite certain, I think that it is obvious to everyone now that the American political system cannot claim to be democratic in every sense of the word."

Dmitry Kiselev: "To be honest, it sounds rather odd to me that you prefer Mr. Biden. Back in 2011, Mr. Biden came to Moscow and tried to dissuade you from running for president.

"Do you remember that episode? He shared the story during his meeting with the Russian opposition at Spaso House. According to Garry Kasparov, Mr. Biden said that he had visited Prime Minister Putin at the Russian White House in order to dissuade him from running for president, and that he had embarked on preparations for an 'Arab' spring in our country. It seems that Biden did not favor you already at that time. You are engaged in a sort of historical duel. Or have you got over it?"

Vladimir Putin: "Honestly, I didn't pay much attention to that."

Dmitry Kiselev: "You got over it, then. You even didn't pay much attention."

Vladimir Putin: "A duel..."

Dmitry Kiselev: "So, it was serious for him but not for you."

Vladimir Putin: "This is really a sign of interference..."

Dmitry Kiselev: "Yes, this is 100 percent blatant interference."

Vladimir Putin: "...Interference in the political processes in our country. We have stated, and I have stated many times: 'We will not let anyone do it.'"

Dmitry Kiselev: "Well then.

"Leaving aside the interference and the electoral battles, the escalation in fact continues. It seems that both superpowers, Russia and the USA, are playing what the Americans call the 'chicken game' (when chickens ram each other); it is a game in which two drivers head toward each other to see who swerves away first. None seems inclined to be the first so far. Is the crash imminent then?"

Vladimir Putin: "Why? The United States announced that they are not going to send troops. We know what American troops in the Russian territory are. These are invaders. That is how we will treat them even if they appear in the territory of Ukraine, and they understand it. I have said that Mr. Biden is a representative of the traditional school and this is proved. Yet, apart from Mr. Biden, they have enough specialists in Russian-American relations and strategic deterrence.

"Therefore, I do not think that it is getting closer to a head-on collision. But we are ready for it. I have said many times that it is a matter of life and death for us, while for them it is a matter of improving their tactical position in the world on the whole as well as maintaining their status among their allies in Europe in particular. This is also important, but not as much as it is for us."

"Our Nuclear Triad Is More Advanced Than Any Other One... We And The Americans Are The Only Ones Who Have Such A Triad"

Dmitry Kiselev: "It is interesting that you said we are ready for it. Philosopher and geopolitical expert Alexander Dugin directly urges to practically prepare for a nuclear war. 'The better we are ready for it, the less likely such a war is,' Mr. Dugin states. How can you ever be prepared for it? Are we really ready for a nuclear war?"

Vladimir Putin: "From a military-technical point of view, we are certainly ready. They [the troops] are constantly on alert. This is the first thing.

"Secondly. Our nuclear triad is more advanced than any other one, and this is also a universally recognized fact. We and the Americans are the only ones who have such a triad, actually.

"Here, we have made a lot more progress. We have a more advanced nuclear component. On the whole, as for carriers and warheads, we have a rough parity, yet, the nuclear component we have is more sophisticated.

"Everyone knows it, all experts do. However, it does not mean that we should compete by the number of carriers or warheads, but we should know about it. And I repeat that those who need it – experts, specialists, the military – are well aware of it.

"Now they are setting the task to increase this modernity, novelty, they have relevant plans. We also know about them. They are developing all their components, so do we. But, in my view, this does not mean that they are ready to wage this nuclear war tomorrow. If they want to, what is there to do? We are ready.

Dmitry Kiselev: "Perhaps, to make it more compelling, we should conduct nuclear tests at some stage? After all, we have no international restrictions for that."

Vladimir Putin: "There is a treaty which bans such kind of tests, however, the United States has not ratified it, unfortunately. That is why to maintain parity we have withdrawn this ratification. Since the treaty was not ratified by the United States, it did not enter into force eventually, as it did not get the required number of ratifications, but we are nevertheless sticking to these agreements.

"We are aware that the possibility of conducting such tests is being considered in the United States. This is due to the fact that, when new warheads appear, as some specialists believe, it is not enough to test them on computer which means that they should be tested for real as well. Such ideas are in the air in some US circles, they exist, and we are aware of them.

"And we are also watching. If they conduct such tests, we will not necessarily do it, we should think whether we need it or not, however, I do not rule out that we can do the same."

Dmitry Kiselev: "But are we ready for it in a technical way?"

Vladimir Putin: "We are always ready. I want to make it clear that these are not conventional weapons, this is the kind of troops which are always on alert."

Dmitry Kiselev: "Mr President, last year, when there were tough moments at the front in connection with Kharkov or Kherson, were you thinking of tactical nuclear weapons?"

Vladimir Putin: "What for? The decision to withdraw troops from Kherson was taken at the suggestion of the then command of the grouping. But it did not mean at all that our front was falling apart there. Nothing like that ever happened. It was just done to avoid unnecessary casualties among the personnel. That is all. This was the main motive, as under the conditions of warfare when it was impossible to fully supply the grouping located on the right bank, we would simply suffer unnecessary losses of personnel. Because of this, it was decided to redeploy them to the left bank.

"The correctness of this decision was confirmed by what the Ukrainian command tried to do in certain areas on the left bank, including in Krynki: they were just throwing their personnel there as if it were a meat grinder. They were running around literally barefoot in the end. They were trying to deliver ammunition there using speedboats and drones. What is that? Just slaughter, they sent them for slaughter.

"I once asked the Chief of the General Staff, there is nothing secret about it, 'In your opinion, who takes the decisions on that side? As the one who is taking the decision understands that he is sending people to certain death?' He answered, 'They understand.' I said, 'But who is taking the decision, why are they doing it? It makes no sense.' – 'It makes no military sense.' I said, 'What sense does it make?' – 'I do not know,' he answered, 'probably, top political leadership, based on political considerations that they have some chance to break through our defense, some chance to get additional money, referring to the fact that they have some bridgehead on the left bank, some chance to present their position at international meetings in a good way.' The command was given, and all the subordinate heads automatically pass it on further.

"By the way, the prisoners that were taken captive there, laid down arms, they show they didn't even know what situation they were getting into. Let's say new forces are moved there and told, 'There is a solid defense there, go on, continue, and help.' They couldn't even get to the left bank anymore.

Dmitry Kiselev: "A tragedy."

Vladimir Putin: "A real tragedy. From a human viewpoint, absolutely.

"So, why do we need to use weapons of mass destruction? There has never been such a need."

Dmitry Kiselev: "That is to say such idea did not even occur to you?"

Vladimir Putin: "No. What for? Weapons exist to be used. We have our own principles; what do they say? That we are ready to use weapons, including the ones you have just mentioned, when it is about the existence of the Russian state, about harming our sovereignty and independence. We have everything spelled out in our Strategy. We have not changed it."

Putin: "The Point Is That This So-Called 'Golden Billion' Has Been Practically Parasitizing On Other Peoples For Centuries, 500 Years"

Dmitry Kiselev: "But it is time to recognize that you play a key role not only in Russia, but also in the world, because billions of people associate with you the hope for international justice, for the defense of human dignity, for the protection of traditional values. How does it feel to feel that level of responsibility?"

Vladimir Putin: "To tell you the truth, I don't feel it at all. I am simply working in the interests of Russia, in the interests of our people. Yes, I understand what you are saying now, and I am ready to comment on it. But I don't feel like I'm some sort of master of the world's destinies. Believe me, nothing even close. I am just doing my duty to Russia and to our people, who consider Russia their Motherland.

"As for other countries of the world, the way we are treated around the world is very closely related to this. That's what is interesting. It is a phenomenon, that's for sure.

"What I would like to draw attention to. You are absolutely right here, many people in the world are looking at us, at what is happening in our country and in our struggle for our interests.

"That's what I think is important. Why is this happening? Not because we are formally members of BRICS or because we have some kind of traditional relations with Africa. This is also important, but the point, in my opinion, is quite different. The point is that this so-called 'golden billion' has been practically parasitizing on other peoples for centuries, 500 years. They tore apart the unfortunate peoples of Africa, they exploited Latin America, they exploited the countries of Asia, and of course no one has forgotten that. I have the feeling that it is not even the leadership of these countries, although it is very important, but the ordinary citizens of these countries feel in their hearts what is happening.

"They associate our struggle for our independence and true sovereignty with their aspirations for their own sovereignty and independent development. But this is aggravated by the fact that there is a very strong desire in Western elites to freeze the current unjust state of affairs in international affairs. They've spent centuries filling their bellies with human flesh and their pockets with money. But they must realize that the vampire ball is ending."

Dmitry Kiselev: "Are you alluding to their, as you put it in your Address, colonial manners? That's what you're saying."

Vladimir Putin: "That's the way it goes."

Dmitry Kiselev: "But now you have painted a perfectly fair picture of people seeing some hope in Russia. How is it that Western propaganda, with all its power, its colossal resources and tools, has failed to banish Russia, isolate it and create a false image of it, although it strived to do so in the heads of billions of people? How did that happen?"

Vladimir Putin: "Because what I just said is more important to people. People all over the world feel it in their hearts. They don't even need any pragmatic explanations for what is happening."

Dmitry Kiselev: "You mean despite the wave of this dirt?"

Vladimir Putin: "Yes. In their own countries they also deceive people, and it has an effect. They – in many countries – believe that this is in their interests because they don't want to have such a huge country like Russia on their borders. The largest in the world in terms of territory, the largest in Europe in terms of population – not such a large population in the global dimension, not comparable to China or India, but the largest in Europe – and now also the fifth largest economy in the world. What do they need such a competitor for? They think: no, it is better, as some American specialists have suggested, to divide it into three, four, or five parts – it will be better for everyone. They proceed from that.

"And part of, at least, Western elites, blinded by their Russophobia, were delighted when they brought us to the line after which our attempts to stop the war unleashed by the West in Ukraine in 2014 by force began, when we switched to conducting a special military operation. They even rejoiced, I think. Because they believed that now they would finish us off, now, under this barrage of sanctions, practically a sanctions war declared against us, with the help of Western weapons and war through Ukrainian nationalists, they would finish off Russia. Hence the slogan: 'To inflict a strategic defeat on Russia on the battlefield.'

"But later came the realization that it was unlikely, and still later – that it was impossible. And they came to understand that instead of a strategic defeat, they are faced with powerlessness, a powerlessness despite the fact that they were relying on the might of the all-powerful United States. They felt frustrated seeing the unity of the Russian people, the fundamentals of the Russian financial and economic system and its sustainability, and before the growing capabilities of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation.

"It was then that they – those who are slightly smarter than others – started to think that the policy towards the Russian Federation has to be changed. It was then that the idea to resume the negotiation process, to find ways to end this conflict, to search for where real interests of Russia lie, appeared. These people are dangerous, by the way, because it is easier to handle people who are guided by such basic urges.

"Do you remember what our ancestors used to say? What the day‑to‑day happiness for many people was? To be full, drunk and with one's nose in tobacco. Right? It is easier to deal with such people when they are full, drunk, in other words, you have eaten and drunk enough. 'Nose in tobacco' means they used snuff tobacco. Now it is more like 'nose in cocaine.' It is all the same, though, such people are just easier to deal with. As for smart people, it's different. Such people are more dangerous because they influence people's minds, including in our society. They will be offering their own wants and wishes as some sort of 'lures' for us.

"You already emphasized it when you asked about the possibility of negotiations. But still. This is the root of the disagreement within the Western society. This is clear, we can see this.

"We are not going to cause divisions. They will manage to do it brilliantly on their own. However, we are going, without any doubt, to make sure our interests are met."

Putin: "The Enemy Attempted To Attack Our State Borders With Subversive Groups"

Dmitry Kiselev: "I cannot but ask. These attacks on the Belgorod and Kursk regions are military action going on in our regions. They act bolder. Do they feel something? What's causing this?"

Vladimir Putin: "The explanation is very simple. This is happening against the backdrop of setbacks at the line of contact, at the front line. They achieved none of the goals they had set last year. What is more, our Armed Forces have fully regained the initiative now. Everybody knows this, everybody admits this. I think I will say nothing new in this regard. They have to demonstrate at least something given the setbacks. Mainly, they want to focus the attention on how the situation is represented in the media.

"The enemy attempted to attack our state borders with subversive groups, first and foremost. The latest report of the General Staff says something up to 300 people, including foreign mercenaries. The enemy's losses amounted to more than 200 people, around 230. The enemy lost seven tanks out of eight that they used, nine armored vehicles out of nine, seven of them made in the United States, they are Bradleys. They used other armored vehicles as well, but mainly for the transportation of the personnel: they drove them to the site, dropped them and left immediately. That is what happens at the border with Belgorod. A little southwards if I am not mistaken, in a particular place, less people are involved. Nevertheless, the main goal – I have no doubts about this – is if not to disrupt the elections in Russia, then at least to hinder the normal course of citizens' expressing their will. This is the first thing.

"The second thing. It is the information effect, as I have said.

"The third thing. It is their wish to obtain anything, a chance, an argument or leverage in a potential future negotiation process: we will return you this, you will return us that.

"But I have said that it is easier to talk to people who are guided by the approach 'full, drunk and with their nose in you-know-what' because one can anticipate what these people are going to do next. They will also attempt something similar in other areas as well but we see through them."